top of page
Blakfy logo: digital marketing agency

Technical SEO Audit: A Step-by-Step Process for Finding Issues

A technical SEO audit is a systematic examination of a website's technical infrastructure to identify issues that prevent search engines from crawling, indexing, and ranking pages effectively. Unlike content audits or backlink analysis, a technical SEO audit focuses on the foundational layer: can Google access your pages, are those pages in the index, and are they performing well enough to compete?

The value of a technical SEO audit is prioritization. Most websites have dozens of technically improvable elements, but only a handful actually limit rankings. A proper audit identifies which issues have meaningful impact so effort is directed at fixes that produce ranking improvements, not cosmetic technical cleanup.

⠀

Step 1: Crawl the Site

⠀

The starting point for any technical SEO audit is crawling the site with a dedicated tool to get a complete picture of what exists and what's broken.

Tool: Screaming Frog SEO Spider (free up to 500 URLs; paid license for larger sites) or Sitebulb.

What to look for in the crawl:

  • 4xx errors (404, 410): Pages returning error responses that are linked from other pages. Each internal link to a 404 wastes crawl budget and link equity.

  • 3xx redirects: Pages that redirect rather than serving content directly. Identify and fix redirect chains (A→B→C should be consolidated to A→C).

  • Blocked by robots.txt: URLs your robots.txt prevents crawlers from accessing. Verify no important pages are being blocked.

  • Noindex tags: Pages with <meta name="robots" content="noindex">. Confirm these are intentionally noindexed.

  • Duplicate page titles and meta descriptions: Multiple pages with identical titles create competition between your own pages in search results.

  • Missing or short meta descriptions: Not a ranking factor, but affects click-through rates in search results.

  • Missing H1 tags: Every page should have exactly one H1.

  • Broken images: Images returning 404 affect page quality and Core Web Vitals.

⠀

Export the crawl to CSV and sort by status code to prioritize: fix 5xx errors first, then 4xx on important pages, then redirect chains.

⠀

Step 2: Audit Robots.txt and XML Sitemap

⠀

⠀

⠀

After the crawl, review the two files that control how Google navigates your site.

Robots.txt audit:

  • Access yourdomain.com/robots.txt and verify no important directories are accidentally blocked

  • Use Google Search Console's robots.txt tester to verify specific important URLs are accessible

  • Confirm CSS and JavaScript files are not blocked (blocking them prevents Google from rendering pages correctly)

  • Verify the sitemap is referenced: Sitemap: https://yourdomain.com/sitemap.xml

⠀

XML sitemap audit:

  • Access your sitemap URL and verify all important pages are listed

  • Check for pages in the sitemap that return 4xx or 3xx (submit clean sitemaps with only live, canonical pages)

  • Compare sitemap URL count against Google Search Console's Sitemaps report — the "Submitted" count should closely match the "Indexed" count if your content is crawlable and indexable

⠀

⠀

Step 3: Check Indexation in Google Search Console

⠀

Google Search Console's Coverage/Indexing report is the authoritative source on which pages Google has indexed and which it hasn't — and why.

What to examine:

"Valid" pages: The count of indexed pages. Compare this against your intended page count. If 50% of your pages aren't indexed, there's a systematic issue requiring investigation.

"Excluded" pages: Pages Google has decided not to index. Examine each exclusion reason:

  • *Duplicate without user-selected canonical*: Google found duplicate content and picked a different canonical than you intended. Review canonical tags.

  • *Crawled — currently not indexed*: Google crawled the page but chose not to index it. This indicates content quality, thin content, or near-duplicate issues — not a technical fix.

  • *Discovered — currently not indexed*: Google found the URL but hasn't crawled it yet. This can indicate crawl budget constraints on large sites.

  • *Blocked by robots.txt*: Verify these are intentionally blocked.

  • *Noindex*: Verify these are intentionally noindexed.

⠀

Manual actions: Check the Manual Actions section for any penalties applied to the site. Manual actions require specific remediation and reconsideration requests.

⠀

Step 4: Audit Canonical Tags

⠀

Canonical tag errors are among the most common issues found in technical SEO audits and among the most impactful when they affect key pages.

Check for:

  • Self-referencing canonicals on all important pages (best practice)

  • Canonicals pointing to non-existent URLs (broken canonicals)

  • Canonicals pointing to redirected URLs (should point directly to the final destination)

  • Pages with no canonical where duplicate versions exist (www/non-www, HTTP/HTTPS, trailing slash variations)

  • Paginated pages using incorrect canonical handling

⠀

The Screaming Frog crawl export includes canonical data. Sort pages by canonical URL to identify anomalies.

⠀

Step 5: Core Web Vitals and Performance Audit

⠀

⠀

⠀

A technical SEO audit is incomplete without performance review. Use these sources:

Google Search Console → Experience → Core Web Vitals: Shows which URL groups are passing, needing improvement, or failing — segmented by mobile and desktop. Failing groups need investigation.

Google PageSpeed Insights: Test your most important pages (homepage, main service/product pages, top organic landing pages). The "Opportunities" section identifies specific optimizations with estimated impact.

Key performance checks:

  • LCP above 2.5 seconds on mobile (usually caused by unoptimized hero images or slow TTFB)

  • CLS above 0.1 (usually caused by images without dimensions or dynamically injected content)

  • INP above 200ms (usually caused by excessive JavaScript execution)

⠀

⠀

Step 6: Mobile and HTTPS Verification

⠀

Mobile usability:

Google Search Console → Experience → Mobile Usability shows pages with mobile rendering issues. Common issues: clickable elements too close together, text too small to read, content wider than the screen.

HTTPS audit:

  • Verify all pages are served over HTTPS

  • Verify HTTP redirects to HTTPS (including all variations: www, non-www)

  • Check for mixed content warnings (HTTPS page loading HTTP resources) using Chrome DevTools Security tab

⠀

⠀

Prioritizing Findings

⠀

After completing the technical SEO audit, categorize issues by impact:

Critical (fix immediately):

  • Crawl blocking affecting important pages

  • Accidental noindex on pages that should be indexed

  • Canonical tags pointing to wrong URLs on key pages

  • HTTP not redirecting to HTTPS

  • Manual actions from Google

⠀

High priority:

  • Large numbers of 4xx internal links

  • Core Web Vitals failing on primary landing pages

  • XML sitemap including non-canonical or 4xx URLs

  • Redirect chains on important pages

⠀

Medium priority:

  • Duplicate titles or meta descriptions

  • Missing structured data on pages where it would produce rich results

  • Crawl budget waste from parameter proliferation on large sites

⠀

Lower priority:

  • Cosmetic metadata improvements on pages that already rank well

  • Minor performance optimizations on already-fast pages

⠀

Blakfy performs technical SEO audits for clients — delivering prioritized issue lists with specific remediation steps, focusing on the technical problems that are actively limiting ranking performance rather than exhaustive checklists.

⠀

⠀

Frequently Asked Questions

⠀

How long does a technical SEO audit take?

A thorough technical SEO audit for a typical business website (50–500 pages) takes 4–8 hours for an experienced SEO professional. Large sites with thousands of pages, complex architectures, or international setups take significantly longer. The audit itself is typically 60% of the work — the other 40% is the prioritized report and remediation recommendations.

What tools do I need to run a technical SEO audit?

The minimum toolkit: Screaming Frog (or Sitebulb) for site crawling, Google Search Console for indexation data, and Google PageSpeed Insights for performance data. These tools cover the core areas of a technical audit. For deeper analysis: server log analyzers (Screaming Frog Log Analyzer), link analysis tools (Ahrefs or Semrush), and Chrome DevTools for specific rendering and performance investigation.

How do I know which technical issues are actually hurting rankings?

The most reliable signal: correlation between technical issues and ranking gaps. If a category of pages has a crawlability or indexation issue and those pages aren't ranking, fixing the technical issue should improve performance. For performance issues, compare Core Web Vitals scores to ranking performance — pages failing CWV that are close to ranking on the first page are most likely to improve from optimization. Not all technical issues affect rankings — some are best practices that have no measurable ranking impact on small sites.

Should I do a technical SEO audit before or after improving content?

Technical SEO audit first. If there are crawlability or indexation issues blocking your pages, improving content on those pages won't improve rankings until the technical issues are fixed. The audit establishes the floor — once you know Google can find and index your pages correctly, content and authority improvements produce expected results. Content improvements on technically broken pages are effort wasted.

bottom of page